This, along with the fact that the gaming juggernaut is suing a 14 year-old, strongly suggests that Epic had no idea who it was suing.
Not only that, but the mother makes a convincing argument that it would be hard for Epic to prove in court that her underage son was bound by its end user licensing agreement (EULA) given that Fortnite is a free-to-play game and its EULA did not contain an option for underage users to obtain parental consent, which she says she never gave. And it appears that since Epic identified her son by name, and he is a minor; the company violated DE law related to the release of information on minors. She adds that Epic wouldn't have lost money as it's a free-to-play title, that her son merely downloaded the cheat software and didn't help create it (as Epic claims), and that releasing her boy's name publicly means Epic has violated DE laws related to the release of information on minors.
Ultimately, she says, that by going after her son rather than the websites who produce cracks like the one he used, Epic Games is using her son as a scapegoat because they can't prevent other players from cheating. Though Epic's aims were to clean up the experience and eliminate problems like third-party aimbots and paid cheating software, an unforeseen issue is the fact that Epic's lawsuit involves an individual that is considered a minor and can not legally be sued.
Like this story? Share it!
"It is illegal to release underage individuals' personal information by any agencies", she writes. Caleb is a minor, he is legally incapable of agreeing to terms and conditions, furthermore, they were not read. "As stated previously, we take cheating seriously, and we'll pursue all available options to make sure our games are fun, fair, and competitive for players". Players found they could literally ride the projectiles fired by the pumpkin launcher that replaced the rocket launcher during Fortnitemares, and hilarity ensued.
The boy was accused by Epic Games of promoting Addicted Cheats, an aimbot software provider, while streaming the free-to-play-battle-royale-version of of Fortnite. Rogers then proceeded to challenge this takedown request, which put Epic into the position of either dropping the claim or file a suit against him, with the latter being the company's choice.